The Hot Sheet Methodology
Amputation Verdicts & Settlements Click on case name to purchase report
Verdict & Settlement Disposition Description Case Name
$11,160,309 Motorcyclist lost his arm in collision with oncoming truck turning left in front of him. Cote v. Murphy
Warren Co., Sup. Ct., No. 47107/05
$7,500,000 Pedestrian hit by tractor-trailer at construction site had to have leg amputated above the knee. Bristman v. Garden Communities
San Diego Co., Super. Ct., No. GIC855357
$6,000,000 Man knocked off his motorcycle by side-swiping semi had left hand amputated. Browning v. Colonial Freight Systems Inc.
W.D., Texas, No. W-06-CA-181
$5,100,000 Complete leg amputation was needed after bicyclist collided with tractor-trailer. Newcomer v. Armstrong World Industries
Lancaster Co., Pa., Ct. C.P., No. CI-05-03911
$4,800,000 Worker's arm was amputated at the shoulder after getting trapped in crushing mechanism of baling machine. Melendez-Natal v. Maren Engineering Corp.
N.Y. Co., Sup. Ct., No.101862/04
$4,000,000 Man whose hand was pulled into grinding machine while he was cleaning it had hand and part of forearm amputated. Hammond v. California Pellet Mill Co.
D.N.J., 05-CV-2932
$4,000,000 Gangrene from post-surgery complications necessitated above-the-knee amputation of both the patient's legs. Bonaguro v. Staten Island University Hospital
Richmond Co., N.Y. Sup. Ct., No. 12957/03
$1,925,000 Teenager lost his dominant hand when he lost his balance while operating a meat grinder at his part-time job. McDade v. Hobart Corp.
Queens Co., N.Y. Sup. Ct., No. 8745/05
Defense Repairman alleged he was startled by rat while servicing elevator, causing fall that resulted in loss of three fingers. Defense claimed building used an exterminator and repairman should have deactivated elevator. Lubina v. 21-31 37 Wallace Avenue Corp.
Bronx Co., N.Y. Sup. Ct. No. 7752/01
Defense Premature newborn had leg amputated weeks after birth due to post-surgery infection. Defense contended infection was not result of negligence and was treated appropriately. Barboza v. Borg
Tarrant Co., Dist. Ct., No. 67-196536

Methodology
The HOT Sheet is a sampling of verdicts, settlements and bench decisions reported by VerdictSearch during the past 12 months. It is not a comprehensive list. It is offered to show a variety of fact patterns and award amounts in a particular area of litigation. The amounts do not reflect reductions for comparative negligence, remittitur or vacatur. In situations where awards are automatically trebled by statute, the trebled amount is listed.

More Case Types

Prescription and Medication Verdicts & Settlements
Industrial Accident Verdicts & Settlements
Bicycle Verdicts & Settlements
Cell Phone Verdicts & Settlements
Unfair Trade Verdicts & Settlements
Police as Defendant Verdicts & Settlements
Invasion of Privacy Verdicts & Settlements
Emotional Distress Verdicts & Settlements
Scaffolds and Ladders Verdicts & Settlements
Assault and Battery Verdicts & Settlements
Intellectual Property Verdicts & Settlements
Bad Faith Verdicts & Settlements
Cardiac Verdicts & Settlements
Fire Verdicts & Settlements
Apartment Verdicts & Settlements
Prisoner Verdicts & Settlements
Drunken Drivers Verdicts & Settlements
Anesthesiology Verdicts & Settlements
Police-Related Verdicts & Settlements
Dental Verdicts & Settlements
Boating Verdicts & Settlements
Oral Agreeemnt Verdicts & Settlements
Gender Discrimination Verdicts & Settlements
Restaurant Verdicts & Settlements
First Amendment Verdicts & Settlements
Childbirth Verdicts & Settlements
Animals Verdicts & Settlements
Dram Shop Verdicts & Settlements
Aviation Verdicts & Settlements
Landlord/Tenant Verdicts & Settlements
Places of Recreation Verdicts & Settlements
False Imprisonment Verdicts & Settlements

Top